However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 4, 2017, 01:30, the Defendant: (a) received a report at the time of taxi rates in front of the Hanyang-gu, Mayang-gu, Songyang-gu; and (b) received a request for payment of taxi rates and returning home from the Gyeong-gu, the Gyeong-gu, Man-gu, the Defendant committed assaulting the face of D on the hand floor by putting her face up one time with a flab and flabing the flab, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 reporting handling affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection and observation [the scope of the sentencing guidelines] - The basic area (from June to June, 1) of types 1 (Interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties) (the decision of sentence] of the basic area (from June to June, 1), [the decision of sentence] - Unfavorable circumstances: The defendant's recognition of a criminal act and reflects the appearance that the defendant reflects.