However, the execution of each of the above punishments for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendants purchased a mobile phone from the taxi engineers who acquire the lost mobile phone from the customers in Daegu City, sell it to the third parties, and make profits from the purchase of H and smartphone.

The name of the phrase "" shall be distributed to the taxi engineer in Daegu-gu, who has worn his/her mother and her clothes at the latest, and he/she shall send a signal to the mobile lighting in the mobile phone name on the road where the si stops while getting on and going on the sib at the latest, or "the President and the telephone summary".

Recognizing that the taxi engineer “ was willing to purchase a mobile phone from others.”

The Defendants conspired to purchase the aforementioned mobile phone at KRW 10,00 from the front taxi in Daegu-gu around September 2015 to the front taxi located in the 228 Park-ro around the end of September, 2015, and acquired stolens by purchasing 37 cell phoness over 37 times in total, such as the list of crimes, from around that time to November 2015, even though they knew that the victim’s non-name-based taxi driver was the cell phone stolen in the market value of KRW 500,000,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each written statement of I, J, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, and Z;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Photographs (No. 309);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (a written statement and a written request for return);

1. The Defendants: Articles 362(1) and 362(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act; and

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of protection observation and community service order: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection;

1. The Defendants: The reasons for sentencing of Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Code [the scope of recommending punishment] of the Criminal Code [the scope of recommendations] is organized in the area of aggravation (one year to three years for general stolens] (one year to three years).