Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant, who is the victim C (math, 39 years of age), was suspected of being her husband D with his husband.

1. Around March 19, 2013, the Defendant, at the early early May 19, 2013, discovered that the said D had reached the house before the victim’s house of 104 Dong 1401 Dong-si, Seocho-si, 104, and that the said D had reached the house, and that the Plaintiff d's house d's house d's house d's house d's house d's house d's house d's house d's house d's house d'

2. The Defendant: (a) committed assault and damage to property in a ward, i.e., 1401 at the same time; (b) franchisation of franchis of the victim; and (c) franchisation, i.e., d., franchis with her husband within the body of husband; and (d) d franchising the victim into a sofa; and (e) franchising the victim into a sofa; and (e) destroyed the victim’s market price of 60,000 won at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to teared clothes and photographs;

1. Articles 319 (1), 260 (1), and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;