2. We examine the judgment, the defendant agreed with the victim C, and deposited KRW 500,00 for the victim G and H, but the defendant is deemed to have been punished due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Crime of Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Crime of Violence, etc.) and the obstruction of performance of official duties, and there are no circumstances to consider the reason or motive of the crime. The court below seems to have determined the punishment in consideration of all the favorable circumstances for the defendant, including the fact that there is no other circumstance that can be mitigated considering the sentencing newly after the judgment of the court below, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is recognized to be appropriate. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.