except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2014. 2. 25. 20:40경 안산시 단원구 C에 있는 ‘D’ 앞길에서, ‘피고인이 대리운전기사를 때린다’는 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 안산상록경찰서 E지구대 소속 순경 F으로부터 신고내용의 진위여부를 확인받자 화가 나 위 F에게 “뭘 꼬나 봐 이 새끼야”, “체포해봐 씹할 놈아, 이 좆같은 새끼야”라고 욕설을 하면서 양손으로 위 F의 가슴을 5회 밀쳤다.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Application of 112 Acts and subordinate statutes on the place of work;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment with prison labor (the crime of this case is committed intentionally with respect to police officers in uniform, and the nature of the crime is inferior and the liability for the crime is grave);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including a relatively minor degree of violence, the defendant reflects his/her mistake in depth, and the fact that there is no record of punishment that suspension of qualifications or more punishment has been imposed) of the Act on Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor (decision of sentence] and two years of suspended execution