However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On March 12, 2014, at around 23:20, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at a place where the location is unknown, and the Defendant was under the influence of telephone conversations with the victim B (the age of 42) on the ground that the Defendant was under the influence of telephone conversations.

After that, around 23:20 on March 12, 2014, the Defendant found the E main points where C is drinking alcohol in Busan Shipping Daegu D, and then came to fit with C with C while talking about it again, the Defendant sought a scam from C, which is a deadly weapon (12cc in blade length) at a place where the location of chemicalization cannot be known, and sought again to find the victim at the above E main points with excessive (12cc in blade length) and assaulted the victim, who is a deadly weapon in the item of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol protocol law to B

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do139, Jan. 1, 201

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;