beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.07.10 2013가단50485

보증채무금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 57,00,000 as well as annual 5% from October 8, 2007 to August 5, 2013 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the whole pleadings in each of the evidence Nos. 2-1, 2, 3, 4, 6-9, 10-1, 2, 11-1, 15-1, 16, 17, 18-1 through 3, 1-1, 1-4, 2-2 through 4, and 6.

The plaintiff, while operating a restaurant in Gwangju, has operated a new business in Gwangju Love Daily Co., Ltd. (the defendant was registered as D on June 30, 2007, but is substantially the same company; hereinafter referred to as "C") and participated in the business explanation meeting on January 2007 and participated in the business explanation meeting from the defendant.

B. On February 2, 2007, the Plaintiff entered into a distribution contract with C (the representative Defendant, and E, who entered into an actual contract with the Defendant, on behalf of the Defendant) and with respect to the exclusive business rights of an selective item in F building, KRW 20,000 won, monthly, monthly, and KRW 800,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 for total goods, total goods, KRW 20,000,000,000,000,000 won, and paid the total franchise fee as at June 2007 (= KRW 20,000,000,000,000,000).

(10 million won per contract date shall be paid to the defendant on March 14, 2007, and 20 million won shall be deposited into the defendant's account on March 14, 2007, and 30 million won shall be loaned from social funds held on June 18, 2007 to G account at the defendant's request).

The plaintiff requested the defendant to visit China's local factories and places of business, accepted it by the defendant, and entered China with the defendant and his wife H, and thereafter, C's additional recruitment of the store was not possible, and C's additional recruitment was not possible, and C's financial situation was judged to be difficult, and C's oral notification of termination of the contract of this case to C, and requested C to return the franchise fee.