보훈보상대상자 비해당 결정처분 취소 청구
1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.
2. On May 11, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision that the Plaintiff was not eligible for veteran’s compensation.
1. The grounds for this part of the reasoning of the disposition are as follows: (a) except where the court renders “A” under Section 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance as “A,” the same part as the relevant part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) accordingly, this part of the judgment is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Defendant added the Plaintiff’s ground for disposition to the effect that it cannot be objectively recognized as a habitive tool of each of the dogs of the Plaintiff at the time of the instant disposition, but the Plaintiff’s ground for disposition added to the ground for disposition that it cannot be deemed that the Plaintiff’s difference was fixed at the time of the instant action. The ground for disposition added to the ground for disposition cannot be said to be identical in the basic point of view. As such, the Plaintiff’s additional ground for disposition is not allowed. 2) The Plaintiff confirmed that the Hea test results in the MRI’s test from both shoulders of the MO to the Heapt, and that the Heashe was found to have suffered from the Heathal disease and the subsequent escape from it, and even in the E.I., even if the E.D. test shows both positive response, the Defendant’s disposition that was judged otherwise to be unlawful.
(b) Entry in the attached Form of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;
C. 1) In an appeal litigation seeking the revocation of an administrative disposition, the agency may add or modify other grounds only to the extent that the original grounds for the disposition are deemed identical to the basic facts. The existence of the factual identity of the basic facts here is determined based on the specific facts prior to the legal evaluation of the grounds for the disposition, based on which the relevant basic social factual relations are identical in a basic point of view, and such separate facts are not recognized as identical to the basic facts.