However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the fixed parking lot of the 5 e-mail mine in the e-mail mine in the e-mail Police Station B, the Defendant, on April 30, 2016, arrested the Defendant’s birth and transferred it to the e-mailing police station by the victim slope C, who is a police police officer affiliated with the Gyeonggi Mine Police Station B, as an offender; and (b) did not put the victim into mind that “I will am son, this son’s son’s son, this son’s son’s son, shot, and bru son’s son, which is the same with the e-mailed disease.

Accordingly, the defendant tried to hand the victim D to the Gambling Police Station type of the Gyeonggi-do Lighting Police Station, and assaulted the victim's eye, booming the victim's eye, and bridged the victim's bridge.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the suppression and investigation of crimes, and at the same time, the victim was in need of approximately one week medical treatment, and the victim was in mind and sacratry.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] general injury [the scope of recommendation] in the case of obstructing the performance of official duties (six months to two years] [the person subject to special aggravated punishment] [the decision of sentence] in the case of obstructing the execution of official duties [the defendant] although the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim, the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case, the defendant was the first offender, and the defendant was bringing up for neglect by giving birth to the child, and all other circumstances are determined as per the order within the scope of the above sentencing criteria.