beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.02.19 2018고합698

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was in alliance with the victim B (V, 52 years of age) in order to manage one teacher in Si interest city.

The Defendant planned to pose a threat to the victim in order to meet again with the victim who is notified by the victim of the decision.

1. On March 2015, while the Defendant was staying in Vietnam with the victim and opening and operating the “C”, the Defendant was signed by the victim on August 2016, by requesting the signature of the victim in blank two pages because it may be necessary for the victim to report the closure of his/her business in order to return to Korea without having access to his/her living condition, etc.

Around March 2017, the Defendant, by using the victim’s signature, who received the victim’s notification of the determination from the victim, received KRW 30 million from the Defendant, and kept the victim’s cash storage certificate, and entered the victim’s promise to return KRW 30 million to the Defendant by December 30, 2016 in the same manner.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a cash custody certificate and a written statement, which is a document on the rights and duties of the victim for the purpose of exercising.

2. On April 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) filed a complaint with the Incheon Western Police Station located in 77, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, for embezzlement and fraud; (b) submitted a forged cash storage certificate and a copy of the relevant document to the police officer in charge of the receipt of the instant case, accompanied by a forged cash storage certificate and a copy of the relevant document; and (c) exercised it.

3. On March 25, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation) and Information Protection and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. (hereinafter referred to as “B”) was informed that he was able to use his mobile phone for the purpose of slandering the victim in E on the 15:58 of Silung City D and the 2nd floor;

B is replaced by fraud,

Fundamentally bad human dignity

“The false content”.