2. The judgment of the court below is only taking into account the facts that the defendant led to confession and reflects the crime of this case, but it appears that the defendant has repeatedly committed the same method of punishment before and after the crime of this case, that the defendant agreed with the victim or has not recovered damage, and that there is no change in circumstances or circumstances that are considered in sentencing after the decision of the court below, and that there is no change in circumstances or circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the age-oriented environment of the defendant. Thus, the defendant's above argument of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.