If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On February 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 22:39 on February 22, 2013, while getting on a taxi in the front of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the Nowon-gu D, Seoul, the Defendant destroyed the part of the NAFnata cab car driven by the victim once a week, thereby damaging the property worth KRW 167,970 in repair dog.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the witness F in the court;

1. Part of the statement made by the police officer concerning F;

1. A written statement;

1. Written estimate;

1. Photographss of places where metres shields of vehicles are damaged, and photographs of places where vehicles are damaged;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing taxi vehicles booms and video CDs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 366 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged is the passenger of the E-business taxi driven by the injured F (57 years of age).

On February 1, 2013, at around 22:39, the Defendant: (a) expressed the desire to get in and go back to the said taxi that is driven by the victim D in the front of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the road of Dobong-gu, Dobong-gu, Seoul; and (b) expressed the victim’s face, breast at two times, and sustained the injury of the scarf, scarf, and scarf, which require treatment for about 14 days, by selling the victim’s face, breast at two times.

2. The evidence as shown in this part of the facts charged includes F’s statement and injury diagnosis statement in the police and the court. However, according to the video of the video CD, the Defendant, who was on the string of the taxi as indicated in the above facts charged, was fighting with F in the horse with F, and was in his body to F with F, and was in a knife with F’s face. However, F did not interfere with F by blocking it for a long time (No. 22:38:59 of the files No. 22 CD 2013-02-38-34.720 of the 22:38:59). Since then, the Defendant again took the face part of F with the left hand, but the Defendant did not come to have a string part of F with the upper part.