2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

In around 2003, the Plaintiff’s wife C lent KRW 50 million to the Defendant, including facility costs and transportation costs of the Jeondo-ro Do-U.S., which was operated by the Defendant in Hongdo-U.S., the Defendant changed the number of assets by forming a uniform, and the present 500 can be held, so the Defendant is obliged to pay KRW 100 million to the Plaintiff.

The Defendant lent KRW 250 million to the Defendant, around 2004, KRW 250 million necessary for the Defendant to purchase land of 2541 square meters of land for a factory in the Jeonnam-gun, Namnam-gun, by auction. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay KRW 250 million to the Plaintiff.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the above sum of KRW 50 million (= KRW 150 million KRW 150 million KRW) and interest or delay damages thereon.

2. On October 24, 2001, the Plaintiff’s wife C lent KRW 150 million to the Defendant for expenses incurred in constructing a neighborhood living facility on the ground of the former Navy, Jeonnam-gun, on the sole basis of the Plaintiff’s wife evidence Nos. 1 through 6, and evidence Nos. 7-1 through 4.

around 2003, the Defendant lent KRW 50 million, such as the facility cost and transportation cost of the electric uniform farm operated by the Hongdo in the Haan-gun, Haan-gun.

In 204, it is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant lent KRW 250 million to the Defendant the purchase price of KRW 250,000,000 necessary for the Plaintiff’s wife C and the Plaintiff’s wife E’s wife E around 2004 through an auction for the Fright of 2541 square meters in Namnam-gun, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise, the Plaintiff’s assertion cannot

3. As such, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed on the ground that it is reasonable.