beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.05.18 2015가단224807

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 17, 2013, when Plaintiff A had experienced catheral catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric cathers, Plaintiff A performed a catheric catic catheric catal catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric catheric cat

3) On June 6, 2013, Plaintiff A, who had no pain and fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluor, was treated on the part of G Hospital located in Pyeongtaek-si, and on June 6, 2013, Plaintiff A was discharged from G Hospital on June 8, 2013, when the fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial

(3) The term “D Hospital” in the context of its Acheon Dental Hospital (hereinafter referred to as “D Hospital”)

(B) On June 8, 2013, the Defendant C, a medical specialist at the D Hospital, diagnosed the Plaintiff as Mannman (pymal dymosis), diagnosed the Plaintiff as Manman (pymal dymmetric dymosis), verified Manman’s severe malmosis, and performed an operation to remove Plaintiff A’s malmical dymical dymosis and farming quantity on the same day on the same day.

2) While performing an operation, Defendant C was in a situation where it was impossible for the Plaintiff to completely bombly bombly cut down the bomb to the greatest extent possible parts. As such, Defendant C was in a situation where it was impossible for the Plaintiff to completely bombly cut off the bomb to the extent possible parts. The organizational life of the operation department is far away from the organizational life of the operation department, and the operation was completed after being charged with the operation. C) Defendant C and the H of the non-urterology department affiliated with D hospital was treated every day from June 8, 2013 by treating the Plaintiff A to disinfect the bombine infection department, and the Plaintiff treated the Plaintiff A’s bombly and frequently complained of heavy pains at the time of disinfection treatment.

2 The medical personnel of the D Hospital shall respond to the plaintiff A's blood test C-Magic c-Madic chlostosis.