2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

A. The indication on the public record of the land 1) The 340 square meters of the B river in Kimhae-si (hereinafter “instant land”).

(2) On July 20, 1912, the former land cadastre of the Republic of Korea stated that C was assessed on July 20, 1912, but there is no other personal information that could identify C, such as the address or date of birth of C. (2) The former land cadastre of the instant case stated that “E in D” was transferred on April 23, 1914, and currently its owner is registered as “D”.

B. The Plaintiff’s inheritance-related 1) deceased on February 28, 1921, when the legal domicile of the deceased deceased on the ground that the deceased deceased on August 24, 1920, the deceased deceased on the ground that the deceased deceased on August 24, 1920, the deceased deceased on the deceased’s heir succeeded to the deceased’s property. 2) The deceased on the deceased’s children, who were the deceased’s children, the deceased on the deceased on February 16, 197, the deceased on the deceased on the deceased on the ground that the deceased on February 16, 197, the deceased on the deceased on the deceased on the ground that the deceased on the part of the deceased on the deceased on the ground that the deceased on February 1, 197, the deceased on the deceased on the part of the deceased on the part of the deceased on the part of the deceased on the ground that the deceased on the part of the deceased on the part of the deceased on the part of the heir, the deceased on the deceased on the part of the deceased on the part of the deceased on the deceased on the deceased on the deceased on the deceased.

3) On December 26, 2016, co-inheritors listed in the foregoing paragraph (2) discussed and divided inherited property with the purport that the Plaintiff unilaterally succeeds to the instant land.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5 (including each number, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on this safety defense

A. With respect to the plaintiff's assertion against the defendant that he has ownership of the land of this case, when the defendant is indicated as C in the land cadastre for the land of this case as the title holder, and it is impossible to identify the title holder or who is the title holder.