However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 19, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 08:55, at the Defendant’s residence of Daejeon Seo-gu B lending 201, the Defendant returned to the Defendant’s home, and (b) the Defendant’s wife C (V) who was the Defendant’s wife (VL 32 years of age) returned to this Defendant, and did not talk with the Defendant about his initial designation of the Defendant, who returned to the Defendant. (c) on the ground that he did not talk with the Defendant, he was placed in the head of the victimized Party, and was placed in an open space where approximately two weeks of treatment is required for the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Photographs of damaged parts, etc.;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence: The circumstances favorable to the point that the case was committed with an injury to the victim with a dangerous article: the confession and reflectment, the agreement with the victim, and the fact that there is no record of the same kind of crime; and