2. As a result of the instant case, the victim’s loss of the victim’s life was serious result; however, at night, the negligence of the victim, who illegally crossed the road of the third-way line at night, appears to have caused considerable damage to the instant accident; the vehicle’s headlight in front at the time seems to have caused considerable difficulty in detecting the victim; the Defendant agreed with the victim’s bereaved family members; the Defendant was admitted to the taxi mutual aid association; the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the commission of the crime, and other various sentencing factors as shown in the instant records and arguments do not seem to have been unfair as the lower court’s punishment is too unfeasible.

3. The appeal by the public prosecutor on the conclusion of the judgment is without merit and is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.