If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 11:00 on January 25, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the D Office operated by the Victim C (SY) located in Sam-do, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would make payment to the 4 million won if he/she borrowed 4 million won.”

However, in fact, there was no issue of purchasing the mother-in vehicle to the private village, and there was no intention or ability to repay the above even if the money was borrowed from the above.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, wired 4 million won from the victim to the account he/she designates, thereby defrauding the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.