When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 13, 2018, around 13:20 on March 13, 2018, the Defendant: (a) placed in D E E (32) an employee in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan City in a cresh amounting to KRW 43,459 won at the market price; (b) cut off 1,500 won at a distance equivalent to KRW 19,80 won at the market price; (c) 2,180 won at a multi-use sticking; (d) 3 picking in an amount equivalent to KRW 1,860 at the market price; and (e) 7,200 won at a free time equal to KRW 7,50 at the market price; and (e) cut off 89,499 won at a household.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A E-document;

1. Investigation report (a case of unfiting damaged articles);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 329 of the choice of punishment (a comprehensive selection of fines);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order / [unfair circumstances] The fact that there was a record of criminal punishment several times for the larceny of the same kind / [ favorable circumstances] recognizing the crime of this case / although it did not reach an agreement with the victim, there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine that the total amount of the damaged goods after the crime of this case would have been paid and property damage would have been recovered. In addition, the defendant's age, sex, criminal conduct, circumstances of the crime, means and result of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime of this case shall be comprehensively considered to determine the punishment as set forth in the order.