However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On January 7, 2018, the Defendant was crossing the taxi without permission on the front of B at the time of the Government of the Gyeonggi-do Government, and accordingly, the taxi vehicles owned by C, which were stopped due to this, became the above C and Si expenses on the wind.

On January 7, 2018, the Defendant, at the above place on the same day and around 18:45, 2018, she saw the Defendant to take a bath at the bar from E belonging to the police station of the government police station of the Gyeonggi-do, which received a request to prevent the Defendant from wearing the Defendant’s fright, and boomed the e-mail, she removed the e-mail, and she flicked the e-mail on several occasions, she fleeped the flick part of the above E, and flicked the chest on one hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to civil petition handling affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (C hearing statements, etc.);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;