When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 18:00 on September 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 18:00 an elevator, and (b) 705 on the ground of late boarding of the victim D (n, 73 years old); (c) during a dispute, the Defendant satisfyed the victim’s head by satisfing the fat and head fating the victim’s head with his hand; (d) continuously satisfying the victim’s head with his/her hand upon the elevator’s wall; (c) after getting off the elevator, the Defendant satfyed the victim’s face from the first floor to sat; (d) satfyed the part of the victim’s neck; and (e) satfyed the victim’s head from the 11st floor to satf and pushed the victim’s head.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as a scarke wall, which requires the victim's treatment for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. A report on occurrence of a crime and a report on internal investigation;

1. Notification to a department related to reporting 112 cases;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes reporting investigation results;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In full view of the facts that the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is old, there are no reasons to reduce a fine for a summary order, taking into account the favorable circumstances, the majority of the previous forces, the damages have not been repaid, and the degree of assault has not been somewhat weak.