except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[criminal power] On March 7, 2007, the defendant was issued a summary order of one million won by the Daegu District Court for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

【Criminal Facts】

On December 5, 2019, at around 18:10, the Defendant driven a BE Q90-car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.152% in the section of approximately 4km from the 1st century to the Newcheon-gu 3442-8, Taecheon-gu, Daegu, where the name located in Thaidong cannot be known.

As a result, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol not less than twice in violation of the prohibition on drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstantial statements of a drinking driver, and inquiry into the results of drinking control;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of sound driving records);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that the defendant acknowledges his/her mistake and does not repeat the crime in violation of his/