Criminal facts have to be proved to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt (Article 307(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act). However, the preparation of evidence and the probative value of evidence conducted on the premise of fact-finding belong to the free judgment of the fact-finding court (Article 308 of the Criminal Procedure Act). For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court, based on the reasons indicated in its reasoning, can sufficiently recognize the fact that the Defendants participated in the instant assembly and occupied the road at the scene of assembly by occupying the road at the assembly site in order or in secret combination with other participants of assembly, thereby interfering with traffic.

Accordingly, the Defendants did not accept the Defendants’ assertion of the grounds of appeal in misunderstanding the facts or misunderstanding the legal principles.

The allegation in the grounds of appeal is the purport of disputing the recognition of facts that served as the basis of the judgment of the court below. It is nothing more than denying the judgment of the court below as to the selection and probative value of evidence belonging to the free judgment of the court of fact-finding. In addition, even if examining the reasoning of the judgment below in light of the aforementioned legal principles and the evidence duly admitted, the judgment of the court below did not err in the misapprehension of the legal principles as to joint principal offenders of public offering, omitting judgment, or exceeding the bounds of the free

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.