2. The judgment of the defendant is the confession of the defendant, and the facts that the defendant did not have the same criminal record are favorable. However, in light of the circumstances, the defendant did not participate in theization and inflicted bodily injury on the victim, who is the other party to the civil litigation case, at the entrance of the court where the order should be maintained due to frequent communication of the parties to the case and lawyers, etc., and thus, there is no agreement with the victim until now, and the defendant did not agree with the victim. Although the defendant acknowledged all the crimes of this case until the court below, although the defendant acknowledged all of the crimes of this case until the court below, the defendant argued that "it is true that the crime of this case was committed, but it is not possible to recognize the part where the injury occurred," the question is whether the defendant's mistake is divided into the truth at the present time in light of its attitude, and it is not judged that the sentence of the court below is excessively unfair.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.