When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is engaged in the business of driving bicycles.

On September 23, 2016, at around 12:30 on September 23, 2016, the Defendant continued the front road of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, into the front road of 64-ro.

A person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance due to safe driving when crossing the road by driving a vehicle or when it is likely to interfere with normal driving of pedestrians or other vehicles.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to cross the above three-lanes from the three-lanes to the one-lanes, and the part of the front part of the passenger taxi vehicle of D(56) driving in the direction of the direction to the left side of the direction to the first lane in the direction of the direction to the left side of the moving direction was taken by the defendant's bicycle side, and again received the front part of the passenger taxi vehicle of D(56) driving in the direction to the left side of the bicycle side of the defendant's bicycle, and again received as the front part of the Gstststa car owned by the victim F.F.(50) under the signal waiting at the two-lanes.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the property that requires an amount equivalent to KRW 441,802 for repairing the damaged vehicle due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Legal statements made by witnesses D in this Court;

1. A survey report on actual conditions, a report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a report on internal investigation, and a report on investigation;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that "the defendant does not have any negligence in connection with the accident of this case and is not responsible for the damage of the damaged vehicle."

However, the following circumstances that can be acknowledged by each evidence of the judgment, namely, ① the traffic accident of this case occurred by the defendant's negligence crossing the three lanes from the road of this case to the one lane without examining the traffic flow of the road of this case, and ② the defendant's person due to the traffic accident of this case.