2. The judgment that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, and that the operating period of the instant crime is not relatively longer for the running period, etc. is favorable to the Defendant.

However, the crime of this case is not consistent with the professional and quality of crime, such as the defendant's act of running a speculative game with a game machine with more than 50 prices as co-offender C and D, and the defendant's act of running the game room in this case, and moving the place to another place by avoiding regulation, and continuing the business. The crime of running the game room in this case is highly harmful to society by encouraging the public's gambling spirit and undermining the will to work. The defendant has a record of being sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for committing the crime of running the game room in the past and exchanging the game money to the customers in cash. The defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for committing the crime of running the game room in the past. The defendant's act of running the game room in this case was under the control of the game room in the crime in this case, and when the investigation was initiated, it cannot be deemed that the sentencing of the court below is too unfair in full view of all the sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, family relationship, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.