beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2016.05.10 2014가단33795

토지인도

Text

1. Of the land listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant),

A. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) B is indicated in the attached Form No. 24, 25, and .

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Since December 18, 2000, the Plaintiff entered into a lease contract between the Plaintiff’s land ownership and D (hereinafter “instant land”) with the land indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant land”).

2) On the land of this case, the owner is the owner of the land of this case who connects each point of 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, and 24, in order to each point of 69 square meters in the (iv) section of the attached drawing, 20, 21, 22, 23, and 20 square meters in order to connect each point of 5 square meters in the (c) section of the same drawing, 32, 33, 34, 37, and 32 of the same drawing, and each part of the above part of the above part of the above part of the building (hereinafter referred to as the "building on the (v) section of the ship which connects each point of 32,33, 34, 37, and 32 of the same drawing, and the land of this case is registered on the (c) section of this case, the land of this case is registered on the 5th section of this case.

3) On January 2001, the Plaintiff entered into a lease contract with D, the owner of the instant building (c), D, the owner of the instant building (v) at approximately 223,680 won at the market price as of October 23, 2014), whereby D, the lease term until D sells the instant building (c), (d) and (e). (b) Defendant B purchased the instant building from D on August 21, 201, and completed the registration of ownership transfer, and received it.

2) From the beginning of early 2013, Defendant B leased the instant building to Defendant C, and Defendant C currently occupies the instant building (iv). [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, A2-8 evidence (including land numbers, and the purport of the entire pleadings).

2. Determination on the main claim

A. According to the recognition prior to the determination as to the claim for removal 1 and removal as to the cause of the claim, Defendant B owned the Plaintiff.