However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 18, 2015, at 02:35, the Defendant used the bus stops located in 200, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, 200 for the head of the bus stops with 112 reported and used the Defendant to have the Defendant returned home, and the head of the Gyeongdae-gu, the Defendant assaulted C at one time as the head of the bus stops with 200, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to crime prevention, suppression and investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. A copy of the working log;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal accidents;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the confession of a crime and reflective nature, the degree of damage to a police officer who has suffered damage, and other factors such as sentencing conditions, etc. prescribed by Article 51 of the Criminal Act);