beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.06.21 2016가단237922

청구이의

Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. In fact, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff for a loan claim against the Plaintiff as Seoul Western District Court Decision 2011dan 65702 (main office).

Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a counterclaim against the Defendant to the same court No. 2011Gadan81506 (Counterclaim).

On September 7, 2012, the court of the first instance rendered a judgment in favor of the defendant that "the defendant (referring to the plaintiff in this case) shall pay 88,590,000 won to the plaintiff (referring to the defendant in this case) and 30,000 won among them at the rate of 24% per annum from August 6, 2010 to the date of full payment, 58,590,000 won per annum from August 16, 201 to February 9, 2012, and 20% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment."

원고는 제1심의 본소 판결에 불복하여 항소하였고, 항소심 법원{같은 법원 2012나8981(본소) 대여금, 2012나8998(반소) 자동차인도}은 2014. 2. 20. “피고는 원고에게 110,159,710원과 그 중 30,000,000원에 대하여는 2010. 8. 6.부터 다 갚는 날까지 연 24^의 비율에 따른 금원을, 50,200,000원에 대하여는 2011. 8. 1.부터, 20,316,660원에 대하여는 2011. 11. 30.부터, 9.643,050원에 대하여는 2011. 12. 10.부터 각 2014. 2. 20.까지는 연 5%, 그 다음날부터 다 갚는 날까지는 연 20%의 각 비율에 따른 금원을 지급하라.”는 판결을 선고하였으며, 위 항소심 판결은 2014. 7. 1. 확정되었다.

On the other hand, on October 15, 2012, based on the original copy of the judgment of the first instance court, the Defendant received a claim amounting to 113,704,330 won by Seoul Western District Court 2012TBT 13,704,330, the debtor and the third debtor as the Republic of Korea, etc., and around that time, collected KRW 479,578 from the Plaintiff’s Bank account, and KRW 1,381,610, respectively through a compulsory auction for the Plaintiff’s corporeal movables on December 18, 2012, and on February 20, 2013, the above collection facts were collected to the above court.