When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On April 13, 2019, the Defendant reported 112 in front of C main points located in Ansan-si B, Ansan-si, on April 22 and 36, 2019, and proposed E to be able to return home by paying the drinking value from the border E belonging to the D District of the Ansan-gu Police Station D District, Ansan-gu, the Defendant, who was called up after receiving a report of 112 that “the son son son son son son son son son son son son,” thereby hindering the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties regarding the handling of 112 reports by the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order prevents the execution of official duties by taking advantage of the police officer who called out after receiving a report on the disturbance from the main point of view. In light of the method of the crime, the liability for the crime is not easy.

On the other hand, the defendant's mistake is recognized and reflected, and there is no record of punishment exceeding the same kind of criminal record or fine.

In such circumstances, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, background of the crime and circumstances before and after the crime shall be determined as ordered by taking into account various sentencing conditions.