2. Although the defendant's mistake is recognized and reflected in the judgment, the crime of this case is planned and organized, the number of forged goods is considerably high, the trademark right holder is not agreed, the defendant commits the crime of this case even though there are two times the punishment of the same criminal acts, and the defendant commits the crime of this case in addition, taking into account the defendant's age, character and conduct, motive and circumstance of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the records and arguments, the sentence of the court below is deemed appropriate and it is deemed unreasonable. Thus, the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.