However, each of the above punishments shall be executed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 24, 2017, Defendants were sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for each of October due to a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry at the Ulsan District Court, and each of the judgment on May 2, 2017 became final and conclusive.

Defendants, as a form of punishment, are invited to operate a money exchange game room in the Dong-gu E Gameland on the D1st, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-si, with the intent of running the money exchange game room, and when employees are informed of the points of obtaining customers from his nameless employees, they were able to write this out and exchange them to customers.

No person shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

On July 7, 2016, at around 19:32, the Defendants set up 40 per annum games classified by the Committee on Water Management of the said E-Games, 20 perfortus games, and 20 per space-based games, and provided customers with points according to the number of times in which the card form realized on the screen is consistent. The Defendants converted points to 20,000 won per 20,000 won per money without money exchange and exchanged them to customers next to the Kabs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Seizure records;

1. Photographs;

1. Previous convictions as indicated in its ruling: An investigation report (37 times a moment), and the application of statutes as a result of the search of a Konet case;

1. Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 37 of the Criminal Act for the treatment of concurrent crimes: Provided, That Article 39 (1) shall apply;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on Suspension of Execution (to select each suspended sentence by applying the sentencing criteria to single concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act, taking into account the following circumstances, such as the fact that a single concurrent crime is committed after Article 37 of the Criminal Act due to a crime committed at the same place, or the size, period of exchange, reflective attitude, health conditions, etc. of the criminal Act);

1. Confiscation (Defendant A) concerning the promotion of the game industry;