However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 24, 2017, around 12:00, the Defendant pointed out that the Defendant was able to catch the Defendant’s breath in the second floor of the building D, Dondo, Donnam-do, the second floor of the building D, and the victim E (49 years old) from the Defendant’s point of view.

For the reason that the phrase "" was written, a name tag, which is a dangerous object on the table, the victim's face was taken one time, and the head was taken one time, and the victim's face part was sleeped by drinking and sprinking the head, and the victim was injured by two weeks of need for approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Documents to be submitted to victims;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted that, as stated in the facts of the crime in the judgment of the defendant, he/she was unable to accept the fact that the victim was injured as a result of internal investigation report (including the scene of occurrence), investigation report (to attach the clothes of the victim, and to submit a written diagnosis of the victim's injury) (the defendant and his/her defense counsel) (the defendant and his/her defense counsel gather a name tag as stated in the judgment of the court below, when he/she saw the victim and she bat the batf, and thereby,

However, at the time of the instant case, F, G, an investigative agency, and this court stated to the effect that “the Defendant made one time each time a victim’s face with his/her head at the time of the instant case.” The victim stated that “at the time of the instant case, he/she was unable to memory because he/she had no mind because he/she had the head at the time, but there was a lot of face face for the last time.” In light of the fact that the witness or the victim’s attitude to make the above witness or the victim’s statement was related to the said statement, and that there was no special circumstance to find the Defendant specifically, each of the above statements that conform to the criminal facts stated in the instant judgment are credibility.