산지관리법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not extract or cut the trees, only once re-exploded the trees.
2. In the judgment of the court below, the defendant argued the same as the above, and the court below rejected the above argument in detail with the statement of the defendant's argument and its judgment under the title "as to the defendant's and his defense counsel's argument". When comparing the above judgment of the court below with the records, the judgment of the court below is just, and there is no error of law by misunderstanding the facts
Therefore, this part of the defendant's argument is without merit.
3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.