A. The lower court’s sentencing is too inappropriate.

B. The lower court’s sentencing is too uncomfortable.

2. Considering the fact that the accused repeatedly committed the instant crime even though he/she had the same criminal record, and that the number of the crimes is not considerable, strict punishment against the accused is required.

However, considering the fact that the defendant has divided his mistake, that the same offense has long been committed, and that the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is deemed appropriate, and is too heavy or unreasonable. Thus, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.