However, it is against the Defendants for three years from the date of the final judgment.

Around March 30, 2011, Defendant A made a false statement to the victim D, who had contacted 200,000 won of a mobile phone on the Internet N.V. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. P. S. S. P. S. S. S. P. S.C. on the L. S. S. P. S. P. S. P. T.S. P. L. S. L. S. S. P. S.C. on the L. S. P. P. P. S. P.C., the Defendant sent a cell phone on the face of the transfer of money.

However, the defendant did not possess a mobile phone and did not have any intention or ability to send a mobile phone to a mobile phone even if he receives money from the victim.

The defendant received 200,000 won from the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of the defendant from the victim.

As a result, the Defendant received a total of KRW 2,585,000 from March 25, 2012, from that time, from that time, by deceiving the victim and receiving property.

The Defendants, as a person in a de facto marital relationship, posted a letter to the effect that they would sell goods on the Internet NAVER bulletin board, and attempted to acquire money from the victims as the price for the goods.

On April 8, 2012, the Defendants concluded that “The Defendant will send a door to a door-to-door, if sent money” to the victim F who reported and contacted the above writing on the Internet NAV Round bulletin board.”

However, the Defendants did not have the intent or ability to pay money to the victim even if they received money from the victim because they did not possess the old cover.

The Defendants, from that point, received 160,000 won from the victim’s foreign exchange bank account in the name of the Defendant B from the victim, from that point of time until April 11, 2012, are set forth in [Attachment Table 2]: Provided, That [Attachment Table 3].