When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 22:55, 2013, the Defendant, while boarding a D taxi operated by the victim C from the Kim Jong-si's Kim Jong-si bus platform located in Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si, made a false statement as to whether it was much before the victim's 's next calendar, and I am.'

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay taxi expenses.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim, did not pay 22,70 won to the 22,700 won of the taxi after getting on the cab and getting on the cab in front of the Hasan Station located in the Hasan-si, Hasan-si.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property benefits equivalent to 22,700 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to receipts [the credibility may be acknowledged to the victim's statement that the defendant aboard a taxi made a statement that he/she had expressed his/her intention to obtain pecuniary benefits equivalent to the cab while driving a taxi in the vicinity of the Doksan basin, and that he/she had changed his/her route several times, and that he/she refused payment of the Dok in the Doksan basin, because he/she had expressed his/her intention to make payment explicitly on the ground that he/she had expressed his/her intention to refuse payment on the ground that he/she had expressed his/her intention to obtain pecuniary benefits equivalent to the Dok basin, even if he/she had arrived at the Dok

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act to bear litigation costs;