beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 2013.04.24 2013고단16

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B

A. On November 13, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents was a person who is engaged in driving of a D mixed-wheeled vehicle. On November 23, 2012, the Defendant was driving ahead of the 3rd line road of the 3rd line of the 2nd line of the 3rd line of the 2nd line of the 3rd line of the 3rd line of the 3rd line of the 3rd line of the 2nd line of the

At night, since the automobile was set off at night, there was a duty of care to safely drive the automobile by reducing the speed and checking the right and the right and the right of the Defendant, who is engaged in the automobile driving.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not discover the victim E (the age of 43) who walked on the road in the same direction as that of the Defendant’s vehicle when he neglected to do so, and caused the injury to which the number of days of treatment could not be known by the Defendant’s vehicle’s driving ahead of it.

B. Around 23:20 on November 13, 2012, the Defendant: (a) driven a mixed-wheeled vehicle without the driver’s license in the section of approximately 3 km from the front of the Gyeonggi-gu Gyeonggi-gu Gyeonggi-si to the front day of the Yansan-gu Peacedong 1 and the front day of the Yansan-gu Peacedong-dong in the Jeonju-si.

2. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving of Frocketing business vehicles. On November 13, 2012, around 23:20, Defendant A was proceeding directly from the side of the Western-dong along the three-lane three-lane road, namely, the cost of the Yansan-gu Peacedong 1 and the three-lane distance ahead of the three-lane road in the west-dong.

At night, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving a motor vehicle, so the defendant, who is engaged in the driving of the motor vehicle, has a duty of care.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and proceeds as it is, paragraph (1) above, on the road near the marine bank.