If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On February 21, 2016, the defendant found that the police officer F of the Busan E District Police Station was performing his duties such as preventing the above time limit, who was dispatched after receiving a report from 112 that the taxi customers are working in front of the D convenience store located in Busan Seo-gu C around February 21, 2016.

The Defendant, without any reason, expressed her desire to see it to see the taxi article, etc., and she expressed her desire to see her “Sweb,” and the above F refrained from the Defendant, and she expressed her desire to her “in the case of the police of this Ma Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma.] by her body

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the notification of photographs, departments related to the report of 112 case;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the detention in the workhouses shall be determined as the same as the order, in consideration of the fact that the defendant reflects his depth on the crime, the first offender, the age, sex, environment, etc. of the defendant;