When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who raises two maths of a dog in which the person in the past is recorded.

In such cases, the owners have the duty of care to control the opening so that the dog does not attack or play any other person by taking safe measures, such as entering the dog.

Nevertheless, around July 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 17:45, around 17:45, the Defendant: (b) carried the victim D(38) of the victim D(38) who was trying to go out of the Republic of Korea with her own by negligence without having the Defendant enter the her own seat; and (c) caused the victim D(38) to go out of the Republic of Korea.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above negligence that caused approximately a week of medical treatment to the victim by a dog requiring medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each photograph, such as a copy of medical records, a photo of the upper part of the medical records;

1. Article 266 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant's assertion and judgment on Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. 주장의 요지 피고인의 개가 피해자를 핥았을 뿐, 피해자를 문 적이 없다.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court of this case, namely, ① the victim, while intending to put the Defendant’s dog in the hallway, with the Defendant’s dog located in this court from the investigative agency to the court of this court, and intending to take another person’s care, stated the Defendant’s dog as to the circumstances and circumstances at the time of the Defendant’s own seat and her own seat, and there is no other motive to make a false statement, and ② the victim’s photograph or its photograph taken after it at the time of this case, is not the right holder’s bridge as soon as possible.