If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The Defendant, around 15:00 on September 2, 2017, prepared a vehicle rental agreement with D and vehicle rental agreement with the victim in front of the Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoul., the Defendant called “I will use the vehicle for three days and return the vehicle 150,000 won after three days.”

However, on September 25, 2017, the Defendant refused to return a siren vehicle without justifiable reasons, such as not returning the vehicle even after the rental period, and then embezzled it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A vehicle rental contract;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the closure of text messages related to vehicle return;

1. Relevant Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;