2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted by the court below and the court below: ① the victim's chest and face was denied at an investigative agency, but the defendant and the victim consistently stated that he was satisfing and satisfing each other (the victim was subject to a summary order of KRW 300,000,00 as a crime of assaulting the defendant by satfing and sating the defendant), ② G at the time of the instant case stated that the defendant and the victim satisfing and satisfing their body while satching with each other. Unlike the victim's assertion, G made a statement that the defendant was not satfling the victim's head, thereby recognizing the credibility of the statement by making a concrete statement in an objective point of view, such as the victim's statement that he did not have been satched by the victim's head; ③ H at the scene of the instant case was not satisfing the victim's body and stated in the investigative agency for the defendant's body.