If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 20:40 on March 25, 2012, the Defendant: (a) called, “the victim C(56 years of age, South Korea) who was a next tabled in the main point of Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, called, “the Defendant shall take personnel service at night and to a punishment,” and (b) made the victim’s spawn for drinking, and spawned down the spathn hand.”

As a result, the Defendant committed the injury that the victim could not know the number of days of treatment, and the injury that the victim flicked, flickly flickly flicked, flickly flicked, and flickly flick

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of an injury part photograph (C);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that the Defendant’s act constitutes self-defense as a passive resistance against the victim’s assault.

However, in full view of the circumstances of this case, the defendant's act against the victim, etc., which can be recognized by the above evidence relations, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted, since the defendant's act cannot be viewed as self-defense.