When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant, around 01:10 on April 13, 2016, was carrying out a woman-friendly Gu and potter in front of the C District District located in Ansan-si, B, and D, “Woo Doz.”

“Along with the Defendant, as the fluor would go to the Defendant, as the fluor would go to the said D.

Therefore, E in the circumstances where the said district group was located, would block the Defendant, and the Defendant, “this dog, spick, shall be changed to her, and both hand, she pushed the Defendant’s chest and pushed the Defendant into E even when he was inside the said district building.

계속하여 위 지구대 내에서도 피고인이 욕설을 하면서 경위 E을 밀치는 등 폭행을 하여, 경위 E 등 경찰관들이 피고인을 공무집행 방해의 현행 범인으로 체포하려 하자, 피고인은 더욱 거세게 항의하면서 손으로 경위 E의 가슴을 밀치고, 발로 경위 E의 다리를 찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties of E concerning the maintenance of order and public order and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, selection of fines (the first offense, confession, and reflectability, and favorable circumstances, such as expression of intention not to punish E);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.