도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] On February 20, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act from the Suwon District Court on February 20, 2008, and received a summary order of KRW 4 million for the same crime from the Jung-gu District Court on April 10, 2013.
[Criminal facts]
1. On January 4, 2017, Defendant 1, who violated the Road Traffic Act (breathing) driven two or more times as above, driven BM5 automobiles at a section of approximately 800 meters from the front day of the Jeonju Bakikiki, which was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.146% in the blood transfusion around 04:00 on January 4, 2017 to the front day of the 35-day jukikikikiki, both of which were under the influence of alcohol content of at least 0.146%.
2. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving service for getting on board BSM5.
On January 4, 2017, at around 04:00, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol, and led the Defendant to proceed bypassing it from the long-distance intersection of the D convenience point located in C at the Hanam-si to the elementary school.
At night, vehicles were parked at the edge of the road due to their housing prices, so there was a duty of care to safely operate the steering employee by accurately operating the steering and steering system.
Nevertheless, as mentioned above, while neglecting this, the Defendant’s vehicle is under the influence of alcohol, and the Defendant’s D convenience store outdoor test operated by the victim E was added to the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, the victim FG owned by the victim F, who continued to be parked at the edge of the road, received the parts of the victim’s G G-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-
Ultimately, even though the Defendant caused the above-mentioned damage to the foregoing passenger car, the park, the pent, etc. due to the above occupational negligence, the Defendant immediately stops and caused the injury.