A. On March 13, 2013, the Plaintiff and his/her husband and wife who completed the marriage report on March 13, 2013 have only two married couple.

B. The Defendant, knowing that C was a spouse, referred to as “self” and met with South Korea, and sent and received Kakao Stockholm dialogue as follows.

- Contents of the conversation C on January 7, 2017: United States.

I think himself.

D Apartment Ga was laid off as a path.

피고 : 어서와 놀다가 C : 버스정류장 피고 : 나 씻지도 않았는데 C : 통과했어 피고 : 운전 조심해 ♡ - 2017. 1. 8.자 대화내용 C : 이제 주차했어 피고 : 잠두 못 자구 나 땜에 너무너무 미안해 C : 무슨 자기가 잘못한 게 뭐가 있다고 피고 : 얼른 들어가서 편하게 잤음 좋겠다.

내 옆에서 재워주고 싶었는데 ㅜㅜ (중략) 피고 : 폰 A 못보게 하믄 안대 패턴을 바꾸던지 C : 왜 그래.

Madton changed land

뭐. 이 마당에 피고 : 아니 괜히 쓸데없는 짓거리 할까봐

C. The Plaintiff came to know of the fact that C and C are living together with the Plaintiff, and C demanded a divorce from the Plaintiff, and the marital life between C and the Plaintiff was broken down.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 and 2 (including additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. In principle, a third party's act of infringing on a couple's communal life falling under the essence of marriage or interfering with the maintenance thereof, and infringing on a spouse's right as the spouse, thereby causing mental pain to the spouse, constitutes a tort.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 201Meu2997 Decided November 20, 2014).B.

According to the facts of recognition under paragraph (1), the plaintiff is obvious in light of the empirical rule that he/she suffered considerable mental suffering due to the infringement of marital life due to improper acts between the defendant and C, and therefore, the defendant is obliged to pay the plaintiff monetary compensation.