except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 02:50 on November 2, 2014, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol on the roads of the zone zone D zone D zone D zone D zone D zone D zone D zone D zone D zone D zone D zone B in the Ora-gu, Oracheon-gu, Oracheon-si, and drinking it to the Defendant, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers’ duties concerning the maintenance of order, etc. by assaulting the police officer E, who was affiliated with the Ora District D zone D zone D zone D zone D zone D zone E,

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of damaged photographs and employment statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

2. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following favorable circumstances) of the suspended sentence [the scope of recommending sentence] of the sentence for the obstruction of performance of official duties (the obstruction of performance of official duties and coercion of official duties) and the basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the sentence [the decision of sentence] of the suspended sentence [the decision of sentence] reflects the defendant's wrongness in depth, and has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime, etc.