(a) Project approval and publication - F Housing Redevelopment rearrangement Project - G publicly notified by Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on November 10, 2011 - Project implementer: Defendant;

B. The adjudication of expropriation by the local Land Tribunal of April 28, 2017 – The subject of compensation: Each “land subject to compensation” indicated in the separate sheet owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “each land of this case”): Compensation for losses: The same shall apply to the statement in the separate sheet in the attached sheet.

- Commencement date of expropriation: An appraisal corporation which is an appraisal corporation, a corporation which is a joint appraisal corporation, and a national appraisal corporation which is a joint appraisal corporation.

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on objection on December 21, 2017 - Compensation subject to compensation: Each of the land in this case - Compensation for losses: The term “adjudication on objection” in the attached Table is indicated.

- An appraisal corporation: The fact that there is no dispute over a dialogue appraisal corporation, a stock appraisal corporation, the fact that there is no dispute over the appraisal corporation, Gap evidence 1 through 4, Eul evidence 1 and 2 (including each number where there is a branch number);

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' assertion that the compensation for losses for each of the lands of this case was unfairly underassessment. The defendant should pay the difference between the reasonable compensation for losses and the compensation for losses in accordance with the court's appraisal and the compensation for losses as well as damages for delay to the plaintiffs.

B. In a lawsuit concerning the increase or decrease of land expropriation 1 compensation, in case where the appraisal by each appraisal agency and the appraisal by a court appraiser are not illegal in the appraisal methods, and there is no illegality in the appraisal methods, and there is no difference in the appraisal results due to the difference in the appraisal results due to the different opinions in terms of the remaining price assessment factors except for the individual assessment factors, among them, one of the appraisal causes a difference in the appraisal results due to a somewhat different difference in the appraisal results. As long as there is no evidence to prove that there is an error in the content of the individual assessment comparison, it is logical and empirical rules to recognize one of the appraisal as a legitimate compensation values.