A. Defendant 1) misunderstanding of facts, and Defendant 20,000 won later when H was Daegu, but the lower court deemed that the Defendant provided H with KRW 200,000 for the purpose of having E elected as the head of the D fisheries cooperative, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment, by misunderstanding of facts. 2) In so doing, the lower court’s sentence of unfair sentencing (a fine of KRW 3 million) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant: (a) requested the members of the Korea Fisheries Union to engage in an election campaign by E and E, which was conducted on February 5, 2013, with respect to the election of the head of the Korea Fisheries Union, which was conducted on February 5, 2013; and (b) provided E-support election campaign. No person may provide money, goods, entertainment, or other property benefits to the elector for the purpose of getting a specific person elected as an executive of the district fisheries cooperative or preventing him/her from being elected. Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around H’s house located in G on December 26, 2012, at around 20:30, was able to request support from H in relation to the election of the head of the Korea Fisheries Union; (b) the Defendant provided cash of KRW 200,000 to the members of the Korea Fisheries Union; and (c) the Defendant provided money to the elector, who is the head of the Korea Fisheries Union; and (d) based on the evidence duly proven by the lower court below.

In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the circumstances presented by the court below are recognized and the above circumstances are revealed through the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below.