If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 11, 2016, at around 22:30, the Defendant: (a) reported at the C cafeteria located in the Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City B and 2, and (b) was sent to the site upon receiving a report from 112, “I interfere with the business of customers by drinking,” and (c) was sent to the Incheon Southern Police Station D District Unit E, Police Officer F, Racing G, and Police Officer for returning home from Ha, and (d) was sent to the face of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on card receipts;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act recognizes and reflects his mistake.

The five-time fine has been sentenced to a previous offense, and there is no previous offense interfering with the execution of official duties.

The conditions of sentencing, such as the defendant's age, sex, family relationship, property status, etc., shall be equally taken into account and the punishment shall be determined as per the order.